gray.
I have no difficulty achieving the first row, and the black
bottomframe for the last row, but I have been unable to get the last
row sides to be gray. Here is the current setups that I have:
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[row] [first] [topframe=on,bottomframe=on,style=bold
ll intermediate
> rows have gray.
> I have no difficulty achieving the first row, and the black bottomframe for
> the last row, but I have been unable to get the last row sides to be gray.
> Here is the current setups that I have:
> \setupTABLE[frame=off]
> \setupTABLE[row] [first]
have no difficulty achieving the first row, and the black bottomframe
for the last row, but I have been unable to get the last row sides to be
gray. Here is the current setups that I have:
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[row] [first] [topframe=on,bottomframe=on,style=bold]
\setupTABLE[row][2
, and the black bottomframe
for the last row, but I have been unable to get the last row sides to be
gray. Here is the current setups that I have:
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[row] [first] [topframe=on,bottomframe=on,style=bold]
\setupTABLE[row][2][topframe=on]
\setupTABLE[row][2][topframe=off
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, T. Kurt Bond wrote:
> If I understand correctly, \setupTABLE applies to each table after the
> \setupTABLE, correct? If so, can you make it only apply to one table?
If you really need it for one table:
\bTABLE
\setupTABLE[...][...]
\setupTABLE[...][...]
\bTR ..
Thanks for the help!
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 10:21 PM Jairo A. del Rio
wrote:
> Hi,
> You could enclose your table and setup using \bgroup and \egroup
>
> \bgroup
> \setupTABLE ...
> \bTABLE ... \eTABLE
> \egroup
>
> \begingroup ... \endgroup also works, although I ha
Hi,
You could enclose your table and setup using \bgroup and \egroup
\bgroup
\setupTABLE ...
\bTABLE ... \eTABLE
\egroup
\begingroup ... \endgroup also works, although I have to admit I'm not
aware of the differences between both.
Regards,
Jairo :)
El sáb., 5 de dic. de 2020 10:01 p. m., T
If I understand correctly, \setupTABLE applies to each table after the
\setupTABLE, correct? If so, can you make it only apply to one table?
--
T. Kurt Bond, tkurtb...@gmail.com, https://tkurtbond.github.io
Hello,
how about to enclose the former TABLE (including its \setupTABLE) into a group
- {} or \bgroup ... \egroup?
I guess setups are local...
Regards,
Lukas
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:30:52 +0200, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the proper way to reset the setups made
Thank you both for your response.
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
What is the proper way to reset the setups made by \setupTABLE so that
successive TABLEs do no inherit the properties set by previous TABLEs?
--
Troy Henderson
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Am 04.10.2013 um 13:31 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.
l...@pontex.cz:
Hello Peter,
two more ways which work OK (my preferred ways):
\section{Alt 1}
\bTABLE
\setupTABLE[width=3cm, height=3cm, align={middle, lohi}] % Place setup
just after \bTABLE
Hi,
Is this wanted or a bug? If it's wanted, then why?
--8---cut here---start-8---
\starttext
\section{Why is the align key not used?}
\setupTABLE[width=3cm, height=3cm, align
is the align key not used?}
\setupTABLE[width=3cm, height=3cm, align={middle, lohi}]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD bla \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\section{Workaround}
\setupTABLE[each][each][width=3cm, height=3cm, align={middle, lohi}]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD bla \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
The \bTABLE does set its
Hello Peter,
two more ways which work OK (my preferred ways):
\section{Alt 1}
\bTABLE
\setupTABLE[width=3cm, height=3cm, align={middle, lohi}] % Place setup just
after \bTABLE...
\bTR \bTD bla \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\section{Alt 2}
\bTABLE[width=3cm, height=3cm, align={middle
Hello,
in the following example (context iv):
1. \setuptable[rulethickness=0.04em] does not work
2. i wish that
\NC 1 \NC \NC
WOULD be something like
\NC \TWO \center{1} \NC
?
-
\enableregime[utf
Am 20.04.10 11:39, schrieb R. Bastian:
Hello,
in the following example (context iv):
1. \setuptable[rulethickness=0.04em] does not work
\setuptables[...]
2. i wish that
\NC 1 \NC \NC
WOULD be something like
\NC \TWO \center{1} \NC
\NC \TWO \ReFormat[c]{1} \NC ?
\enableregime[utf
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:37:06 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com scribit:
Am 20.04.10 11:39, schrieb R. Bastian:
Hello,
in the following example (context iv):
1. \setuptable[rulethickness=0.04em] does not work
\setuptables[...]
ok, but i am using 'table
Am 20.04.10 17:16, schrieb R. Bastian:
2. i wish that
\NC 1 \NC \NC
WOULD be something like
\NC \TWO \center{1} \NC
\NC \TWO \ReFormat[c]{1} \NC ?
ok, which is the max ? EIGHT does not work ...
The names are limited from \ONE to \SIX but with the \use command there
is no
put an invisible frame around the table.
On 7/4/07, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/7/3, Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Got it. Thanks. I didn't know that the chars after setupTABLE could
disturb the alignment.
only in horizontal mode, e.g. in \hbox or \framed
that the code that joins the
legend to the table must put an invisible frame around the table.
\starttext
\showframe
\startbuffer
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\bTABLE
\bTR
This is what I meant:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[r][1][topframe=on,bottomframe=on]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \input knuth \relax \eTD\eTR
2007/7/4, Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is what I meant:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\startsetups table
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\setupTABLE[r][1
2007/7/2, Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's the reaosn for this behaviour?
Try:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame=on]
\bTABLE\bTR\bTD text \eTD\eTR\eTABLE
\stop
\stopbuffer
\framed[offset=overlay]{\getbuffer}
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame
Got it. Thanks. I didn't know that the chars after setupTABLE could
disturb the alignment.
On 7/3/07, Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/7/2, Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's the reaosn for this behaviour?
Try:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame
2007/7/3, Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Got it. Thanks. I didn't know that the chars after setupTABLE could
disturb the alignment.
only in horizontal mode, e.g. in \hbox or \framed
Wolfgang
___
If your question
What's the reaosn for this behaviour?
Try:
\starttext
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame=on]
\bTABLE\bTR\bTD text \eTD\eTR\eTABLE
\stop
\stopbuffer
\framed[offset=overlay]{\getbuffer}
\startbuffer
\start
\setupTABLE[frame=on]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align=right]
\bTABLE\bTR\bTD text \eTD\eTR
Hi,
There is something wrong with \setupTABLE. The align= is being
ignored (this is very old code, so this used to work)
\setupTABLE[frame=on,width=3em,height=3em,align={middle,lohi}]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD 3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \bTD 5 \eTD \bTD 6 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD
� wrote:
Hello,
in accordance to http://context.literatesolutions.com/collector/52
I got used to write things like:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[c][1][style=before,bottom=after]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD X\eTD\bTD bla\eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD X\eTD\bTD bla\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
This worked fine
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
\bTABLE[left={(},right={)},top=\startnarrower,bottom=\stopnarrower]
\bTR \bTD something \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
Thank you very much!
If this goes into the distribution, the item
http://context.literatesolutions.com/collector/52 can be considered
resolved.
Hello,
in accordance to http://context.literatesolutions.com/collector/52
I got used to write things like:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[c][1][style=before,bottom=after]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD X\eTD\bTD bla\eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD X\eTD\bTD bla\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
This worked fine, but with the latest ConTeXt
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Peter Münster wrote:
as you already know, I use \setupTABLE[bottom=] to attach some tokens to a
table-cell:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[c][odd][bottom=XX]
\setupTABLE[c][even][bottom=YY]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD bla \eTD\bTD bla \eTD\bTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
But here, I get
� wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 rows, and I would like to have a thick rule on the top and the
bottom of the table, and in the middle a thin rule. I do this the following
way:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[r][1][topframe=on,rulethickness=1pt]
\setupTABLE[r][2][topframe
Hello,
I have 2 rows, and I would like to have a thick rule on the top and the
bottom of the table, and in the middle a thin rule. I do this the following
way:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[frame=off]
\setupTABLE[r][1][topframe=on,rulethickness=1pt]
\setupTABLE[r][2][topframe=on,rulethickness=0.3pt
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hi wizards!
In my typescript I define a condensed variant:
\definefontvariant [Serif] [cond] [Cond]
That works fine if I call \Var[cond] where I need it.
But if I try to setup a TABLE column like this:
\setupTABLE[c][3][width=10em, distance=2em, style={\Var
Hi wizards!
In my typescript I define a condensed variant:
\definefontvariant [Serif] [cond] [Cond]
That works fine if I call \Var[cond] where I need it.
But if I try to setup a TABLE column like this:
\setupTABLE[c][3][width=10em, distance=2em, style={\Var[cond]}]
I get:
! Incomplete
� wrote:
Hello,
here comes another feature request:
independant horizontal and vertical offsets in TABLE-cells. Or even
topoffset, bottomoffset, leftoffset and rightoffset.
that may come in a future version of context when \framed will have them
(currently ot would slow down too much)
Hello,
here comes another feature request:
independant horizontal and vertical offsets in TABLE-cells. Or even
topoffset, bottomoffset, leftoffset and rightoffset.
Greetings, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
ntg-context mailing list
Hello,
is there a possibility, to get automatic column widths with natural tables,
and specifying only the total table width as with SetTableToWidth{...} ?
Greetings, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
39 matches
Mail list logo
